135 P.3d 157
No. 86,855.Supreme Court of Kansas.
May 10, 2006.
ORDERATTORNEY AND CLIENT — Disciplinary Proceeding — Probation Termination.
On October 26, 2001, this court placed the respondent, Stephen Paul Flack, on supervised probation for a 2-year period. Se In re Flack, 272 Kan. 465, 33 P.3d 1281 (2001). The respondent’s supervising attorney, William G. Hammond, has submitted a letter to the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which he verified the respondent’s compliance with the conditions imposed upon him by this court. The respondent provided an affidavit to the Disciplinary Administrator’s office in which he verified his compliance with the conditions imposed by this court. The Disciplinary Administrator’s office recommends that the respondent’s probation be terminated.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent’s 2-year supervised probation be terminated. It is further ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.
Dated this 10th day of May, 2006.
Page 842
512 P.3d 729 (2022) In the MATTER OF Bradley A. PISTOTNIK, Respondent. No. 124,868.Supreme Court…
256 P. 1008 (1927) 123 Kan. 711 Supreme Court of Kansas. BROWN v. OLIVER. No.…
573 P.2d 985 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Appellant. No. 48,641Supreme Court…
King v. State. No. 97,931.Supreme Court of Kansas. November 4, 2008. Appeal from the Unpublished.…
683 P.2d 1292 MARVIN G. LUTTRELL, Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE SYSTEM, INC., Appellee. No. 56,031Court…
KILEY v. PETSMART, INC. No. 89,893.Supreme Court of Kansas. March 31, 2004. Reported below 32…